What is it about?
This study examines how the Indian public perceives the legitimacy of the stricter hit-and-run provisions introduced under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. It investigates whether citizens view the law as fair, necessary, and effective in improving road safety, while also exploring concerns about its implementation and potential consequences for drivers.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Road traffic crashes claim thousands of lives in India every year, and hit-and-run incidents often leave victims without timely assistance or justice. Understanding public acceptance of stricter legal penalties is crucial because laws are more likely to be effective when they are perceived as legitimate and fair. The study provides evidence that can help policymakers balance deterrence, enforcement, and public trust.
Perspectives
This study shifts the discussion beyond legal provisions to the issue of public legitimacy—whether citizens believe the law deserves compliance and support. Its findings suggest that improving road safety requires not only stricter penalties but also transparent enforcement, public trust, and measures that encourage drivers to assist accident victims. The research provides a foundation for evidence-based road safety policies that are both effective and socially accepted.
Prof. Ramphul Ohlan
Maharshi Dayanand University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Perceived legitimacy of India’s stricter hit-and-run law, Safer Communities, June 2026, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/sc-10-2025-0069.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
