What is it about?

This is a conceptual paper that aims to (1) discuss how risk identification outcomes differ between Risk Management 1 (RM1) and Risk Management 2 (RM2) and (2) describe the potential consequences of these different outcomes on the organization at different management levels. This research challenges the traditional thinking that risk management is confined to the financial and operational aspects of the organization. It presents risk management as a strategic and value-adding process that contributes to organizational safety and which should be considered as an inseparable part of corporate strategy.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Senior executives need to be aware of the form of risk management adopted, and whether they follow RM1 or RM2 in their organizations. This is significant as it describes how different risk management arrangements may produce different risk identification outcomes. Risk management has commonly been presented as a “process” in the literature but less often discussed as a corporate philosophy that can influence other areas of business.

Perspectives

Based on the literature review, it was found that research on RM1 and RM2 is scarce and is limited to a few online discussions posted on some web forums and accordingly, this is the first structured study that discusses how risk identification outcomes may vary between RM1 and RM2.

Professor Ihab Hanna Sawalha
American University of Madaba

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Framing risk identification: a managerial perspective, Journal of Knowledge Risk and Sustainable Management, September 2026, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/krism-04-2026-0018.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page