When Careers Stall: How Conformity Protects Voluntary Effort at Work

What is it about?

This study explores how career compromise—employees’ frustration over lowering their career goals—reduces organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), or voluntary workplace contributions. Based on Conservation of Resources theory, employees who feel forced to accept career setbacks often develop depersonalization toward leaders. This distancing helps them cope with disappointment but depletes emotional resources, reducing their willingness to engage in discretionary behaviors that benefit the organization. Survey data from employees in Portugal’s construction retail sector show that depersonalization explains why career compromise reduces voluntary effort. When employees feel detached from leaders, they conserve energy instead of engaging in extra-role behaviors like helping colleagues or exceeding duties. However, this effect is weaker among employees with strong conformity orientation—those who value harmony and rule adherence. Their respect for norms and collective well-being sustains cooperation despite career dissatisfaction. The findings suggest that conformity, often viewed as restrictive, can serve a constructive function by sustaining cooperation in times of career strain. Organizations can help employees navigate frustration without disengaging by reinforcing shared values, clear expectations, and mutual respect. By understanding how personal orientations buffer emotional depletion, leaders can better preserve morale and voluntary commitment when career advancement feels blocked.

Featured Image

Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Why is it important?

This study is unique in identifying depersonalization as the emotional mechanism through which career compromise erodes voluntary engagement, while conformity orientation acts as a critical buffer. By integrating COR theory with personal value frameworks, it reveals that conformity can function as an adaptive resource rather than a constraint, promoting emotional balance and continued cooperation when professional advancement is limited. The research broadens understanding of how employees convert value-based alignment into psychological protection against disengagement and energy loss. It is also timely, given the rising prevalence of career stagnation and job insecurity in volatile global labor markets. Conducted in Portugal, the study highlights how shared norms, respect for hierarchy, and collective orientation foster stability amid uncertainty. It underscores a key managerial insight: by cultivating fairness, consistency, and mutual respect, leaders can sustain employees’ willingness to contribute voluntarily even when career progress slows, transforming conformity into a source of strength and organizational continuity.