What is it about?
People born with cleft lip and palate often have an underdeveloped upper jaw that can affect their appearance and function. This study compared three different surgical techniques to improve the position of the upper jaw: a traditional method (Le Fort I), an external device method (RED), and a newer approach called anterior maxillary distraction (AMDO). The researchers found that the new AMDO technique was just as effective as the external device method in moving the upper jaw forward and improving facial appearance, but with less discomfort for patients. AMDO also helped maintain proper speech function and was less invasive than other methods. This finding gives surgeons and patients a new, effective option for treating underdeveloped upper jaws in people with cleft lip and palate. The study's results help doctors choose the most appropriate surgical method for each patient's specific needs.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This research represents a significant advancement in treating cleft lip and palate patients for several key reasons: Better Patient Experience The new AMDO technique achieves excellent results without requiring external devices on the face Patients experience less discomfort during treatment The method is less visible and potentially less stigmatizing during the healing process Surgical Innovation First comprehensive comparison of three major surgical techniques Provides clear evidence that the newer, less invasive AMDO method works as well as more established techniques Helps preserve speech function, which is a crucial concern for these patients Practical Clinical Impact Gives surgeons a new, proven option for treating patients Helps doctors make more informed decisions about which technique to use for different patients Could particularly benefit patients who need moderate jaw advancement and have concerns about external devices Long-term Benefits Shows similar stability in results compared to existing techniques Offers good soft tissue improvements, which are essential for facial appearance Provides space for proper tooth alignment, addressing multiple treatment needs at once Cost-Effective Healthcare May reduce overall treatment time and complications Could lower healthcare costs by avoiding external devices Potentially reduces the need for additional procedures This research fills an important gap in surgical knowledge and provides evidence-based guidance for improving care of cleft lip and palate patients, potentially changing the standard approach to treatment in suitable cases.
Perspectives
As a researcher in craniofacial surgery, this study represents a particularly meaningful advancement in how we treat cleft lip and palate patients. What makes this work especially compelling to me is its focus on improving patients' quality of life while maintaining surgical effectiveness. Having observed the challenges that patients face with traditional external devices (RED), I've seen firsthand how the visibility of the equipment can affect their social interactions and daily life. What excites me most about the AMDO technique is how it achieves similar results while being much less conspicuous and more comfortable for patients. The most rewarding aspect of this research was discovering that we could achieve excellent results with a less invasive approach. Watching patients progress through treatment with less visible equipment and fewer social barriers was particularly gratifying. The positive feedback from patients about their experience with AMDO compared to other methods reinforced the value of this research. One surprising finding was how well the soft tissue adapted to the gradual changes with AMDO. This wasn't just about moving bones – it was about achieving harmony in facial appearance, which is crucial for patients' confidence and well-being. Looking ahead, I believe this research opens new possibilities for personalizing treatment approaches. While AMDO may not be suitable for every case, having this additional option allows us to better match the treatment to each patient's specific needs and preferences. The journey of developing and validating this technique has reinforced my belief that sometimes the best solutions aren't necessarily the most complex ones. Sometimes, they're the ones that achieve the desired results while making the treatment process easier for our patients.
Hiroyuki Kanzaki
Tsurumi University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Midfacial Changes Through Anterior Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, June 2017, Wolters Kluwer Health,
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003506.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
