What is it about?

The anti-money laundering policy intervention has less than 0.1 percent impact on criminal finances, compliance costs exceed recovered criminal funds more than a hundred times over, and banks, taxpayers and ordinary citizens are penalized more than criminal enterprise.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Reveals the full scale of the problem when a major policymaking function develops separately from public policy design principles, and calls for cross-disciplinary engagement.

Perspectives

There is a huge gap between policy intent and results. The scale of the problem not addressed by “solutions” repeatedly “fixing” the same perceived issues suggest that blaming banks for not “properly” implementing anti-money laundering laws is a convenient fiction. Fundamental problems may lie instead with the design of the core policy prescription itself. With an important policymaking function operating largely as an independent silo of specialist knowledge, this paper suggests that active engagement with critical, diverse perspectives, and deeper connections between the anti-money laundering movement and other disciplines (notably, policy effectiveness, outcomes and evaluation principles of public policy) should contribute to better results.

Dr Ronald F Pol
La Trobe University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Anti-money laundering: The world's least effective policy experiment? Together, we can fix it, Policy Design and Practice, January 2020, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1725366.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page