What is it about?

In the late 1950s, American poet Muriel Rukeyser was commissioned by the magazine The Nation to write an essay about women and poetry. Ultimately, the editors decided not to publish what she wrote. It is no surprise: Her essay, "Many Keys," is a critique of how the cold war literary establishment devalued women's experience and the poetry written about and out of that experience. Her essay is published for the first time here, along with a critical introduction that explains its significance as a lost or suppressed forerunner of second-wave feminist poetry.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

For readers familiar with her work, "Many Keys" disproves common misunderstandings that Rukeyser, a single mother, was largely inactive as a writer or a public intellectual during the 1950s and after her son's birth. This essay gives us a stronger sense of how she was--and how she knew she was--suppressed as a progressive woman. For readers who don't know Rukeyser, "Many Keys" supplies a "missing link" in the lineage of second-wave feminist literary writing. It is a lost predecessor to the better known work of writers from the 1970s, including Adrienne Rich and other admirers of Rukeyser.

Perspectives

I was particularly excited to discover in the archives this essay and the related notes, drafts, and correspondence. Rukeyser's ideas about open form, what she calls "organic poetry," situate her work at the epicenter of what was going on in innovative American poetry after the Second World War. But more importantly, she articulates how open form is gendered, thus tying poetry--at the formal as well as the narrative levels- to the lives and experiences of the men and women who write it. So, "Many Keys" gives us yet another way of thinking about, and complicating our understandings of, how the personal is political.

Professor Eric Keenaghan
The University at Albany, SUNY

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: There is no glass woman: Muriel Rukeyser’s lost feminist essay “Many Keys”, Feminist Modernist Studies, September 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/24692921.2017.1368883.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page