What is it about?

This article discusses the socio-political context in which Bolívar wrote the so-called Jamaica Letter (1815). It considers the social and racial tensions that characterized the Wars of Independence and the various political and economic interests that sustained the Liberator's call for British support in the creation of free and independent republics in South America. The article concludes by showing how Bolívar’s political thought underwent a drastic change in 1819 by promoting the abolition of slavery, the defense of Indian communities, and the adoption of civil rights as basic tenets of the new liberal order he envisaged in Spanish America.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

By looking at Bolívar’s personal correspondence and other political writings of the period, this article reveals some problematic aspects of the Liberator's thought regarding the capacity of Spanish Americans for self-government and the place assigned to marginalized ethnic groups within the revolutionary political process. In this respect, the author hopes to contribute to the "demythologization" of the Jamaica Letter without losing sight of the evolution of Bolívar’s political thought, particularly as manifested in his first constitutional project of 1819.

Perspectives

Bolívar’s Jamaica Letter, undoubtedly his most well-known political essay, has never ceased to be a source of inspiration for all sorts of Americanist projects on various sides of the political spectrum. The Jamaica Letter is nevertheless fraught with the social and political prejudices that characterized the conservative sectors of the Spanish American creole elites. It also shows the potential risks posed by Bolívar’s desire to obtain British support in the consolidation of prosperous liberal republics in South America. It is clear, nevertheless, that Bolívar was able to surpass the idiosyncratic principles of natural law he defended in the Jamaica Letter in order to promote, in 1819, a revolutionary conception of the social contract based on the legal equality of all members of society which included the abolition of slavery and, a few years later, the legal protection of basic indigenous rights. Sadly, the implications of his social doctrine proved to be too revolutionary for his time. In a deeply hierarchical and racially stratified society economically dependent on slave work force, the ideas of universal freedom and equality were doomed to meet strong opposition. The failure of the Venezuelan Congress of 1819 to implement the Liberator's social reforms marked the beginning of a new political order based on exclusion and inequality, principles which were not radically different from the hierarchical structures of the colonial regime against which the Wars of Independence had been waged and which still dominate the social organization of most countries in Latin America.

Humberto Nunez Faraco
University College London

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The entanglements of freedom: Simón Bolívar’s Jamaica Letter and its socio-political context (1810–1819), Global Intellectual History, June 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/23801883.2017.1332882.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page