What is it about?
This article examines how multiple international tax rules interact when multinational companies use cross-border intra-group loans. It shows that transfer pricing, interest limitation rules, anti-hybrid provisions, treaty-abuse rules and Pillar Two can all apply to the same financing arrangement, creating what we call “layered tax governance.” Using the UK, Germany and India as examples, the study highlights where these rules overlap, where they work differently, and how their combined application can increase compliance and documentation burdens for multinational firms. It also explains why strong internal tax governance and effective coordination between tax rules are increasingly important.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The study shows how multiple international tax rules can apply simultaneously to the same cross-border intra-group loan. Although each rule has a distinct purpose, their interaction can create overlapping requirements, inconsistent definitions and substantial documentation burdens for multinational firms. The findings highlight the need for better coordination between tax rules, stronger internal tax-governance systems and regulatory design that limits unnecessary complexity without weakening anti-avoidance objectives.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Layered tax governance of multinational debt: regulatory interaction under BEPS, ATAD and Pillar Two, Cogent Business & Management, September 2026, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2026.2725389.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







