Competition for control of the state and the transitional justice agenda among Tunisian civil society organisations

What is it about?

"Competition for Control of the State and the Transitional Justice Agenda Among Tunisian Civil Society Organizations" is an insightful article authored by Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm, published in Peacebuilding in March 2021. The article delves into the complex dynamics surrounding transitional justice in Tunisia, particularly focusing on the competition among civil society organizations (CSOs) for influence over the transitional justice agenda. Tunisia's transition from authoritarian rule to democracy following the Arab Spring has been marked by significant challenges and opportunities, including the pursuit of transitional justice to address past human rights abuses. Wiebelhaus-Brahm examines how various CSOs in Tunisia vie for control over the transitional justice process, seeking to shape policies and outcomes according to their respective interests and agendas. The author sheds light on the diverse landscape of Tunisian civil society, which encompasses a wide range of organizations representing different social, political, and ideological perspectives. These CSOs often compete with each other for funding, visibility, and influence, leading to complex power dynamics within the transitional justice arena. One of the central arguments of the article is the interplay between competition for control of the state and the transitional justice agenda. Wiebelhaus-Brahm argues that CSOs in Tunisia strategically align themselves with political actors and institutions to advance their transitional justice objectives. This alignment can influence the prioritization of certain issues, the allocation of resources, and the overall direction of transitional justice efforts. Furthermore, the article examines the role of international actors in shaping the transitional justice landscape in Tunisia. Foreign governments, donors, and international organizations often provide financial and technical support to Tunisian CSOs, leading to both opportunities and challenges in the pursuit of transitional justice. Wiebelhaus-Brahm also highlights the tensions and conflicts that can arise within civil society coalitions advocating for transitional justice. Differences in ideology, strategy, and priorities can lead to fragmentation and competition, undermining collective efforts to address past human rights abuses effectively. In conclusion, the article underscores the importance of understanding the dynamics of competition among Tunisian CSOs in shaping the transitional justice agenda. It calls for greater attention to the role of civil society in democratic transitions and the need for inclusive and participatory approaches to transitional justice that reflect the diverse interests and perspectives within society. Ultimately, navigating the complexities of competition for control of the state and the transitional justice agenda is crucial for advancing reconciliation, accountability, and democracy in Tunisia.

Featured Image