What is it about?

This essay argues that the 1994 genocide in Rwanda is important for the debate about ‘humanitarian interventions’ in two different ways: on the one hand, as a signifier, ‘Rwanda 1994’ has served to justify an almost unlimited agenda of liberal interventionism; on the other, the Rwandan genocide represents the exceptional case where military intervention can indeed be justified—but precisely because it is not in need of a specifically liberal justification.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Dual Use of an Historical Event: ‘Rwanda 1994’, the Justification and Critique of Liberal Interventionism, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, October 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2014.956994.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page