What is it about?
Teacher educators needing to meet requirements of state licensing bodies and accrediting organizations are in a position similar to that of K-12 teachers: they must adhere to externally imposed standards and curricular requirements while keeping their courses rigorous, interesting, and critical. This article reports results from a self-study exploring (1) how a teacher educator used a state-mandated course with prescribed curriculum to model adhering to the curriculum while also challenging it, and (2) how a teacher educator encouraged critical evaluation of state policy while adhering to the prescribed state curriculum. Drawing from data collected during a pre-service ESL methods course, the key assertion of the study is that it is both possible and desirable to model critical teaching in courses that require strict adherence to standards and may include a prescribed scope and sequence, mandated topics, or time allotment requirements.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Lots of teachers face restrictive mandates when they start teaching, but their university coursework doesn't always prepare them for the messy realities of how to deal with someone else telling them exactly what to teach. This article shows how one teacher educator modeled working within such a restrictive framework.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Compliance and Resistance: Showing Future Teachers How to Navigate Curriculum, Studying Teacher Education, January 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/17425964.2018.1428794.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







