What is it about?
Self-direction is emerging as a promising model of service delivery for people with serious mental health conditions, and one that aligns with the federal focus on individualized, person-driven care to effect recovery. Under the model, individuals who use publicly funded mental-health services, and who have an interest in selecting their recovery supports, develop a person-centered plan and make use of a flexible budget to purchase goods and services to meet their long-term health and wellness goals. But what impact will self-direction have on the mental health system in general, and how do state and county program directors view it? We conducted an exploratory survey (n = 46) and interviews (n = 17) with program directors to find out.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Self-direction marks a paradigm shift from existing service system arrangements, shifting control over public resources to individual participants rather than just reimbursing traditional providers for services they render. Mental health program directors hold a pivotal role in self-direction’s adoption and implementation, so we wanted to gauge their interest and understand their views on this emerging practice.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Mental health leadership perspectives on self-direction, Social Work in Mental Health, November 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/15332985.2017.1395783.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page