What is it about?
Using 232 responses collected from a sample of nonprofit healthcare organisations (NPHOs) in Australia and New Zealand, we empirically validated an improved performance measurement (PM) system for nonprofit organisations. We make a significant contribution to the literature on nonprofit PM as my work addresses the main shortcomings of the theoretical framework of a well-known PM system known as the balanced scorecard (BSC) developed by Professor Robert Kaplan of Harvard University. We used the state-of-the art in partial-least squares structural equation modelling to test the model, which is a coherent set of cause-effect hypotheses involving the performance dimensions underpinning the PM system. In essence, the study validated the overall hypothesis: “mission drives the strategy to achieve the stakeholder outcomes”. The study is the first of its kind on development of a PM framework specific to Australasian NPHOs.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The study is the first of its kind on development of a performance measurement framework specific to Australasian nonprofit healthcare organisations.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Validating the balanced scorecard framework for nonprofit organisations: an empirical study involving Australasian healthcare, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, July 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1345620.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







