What is it about?

Video podcasts have become one of the fastest developing trends in learning and teaching. The study explored the effect of the presenting mode of educational video podcasts on the learning process and learning outcomes. Prior to viewing a video podcast, the 94 Chinese undergraduates participating in the study completed a demographic questionnaire and prior knowledge test. The learning process was investigated by eye-tracking and the learning outcome by a learning test. The results revealed that the participants using the video podcast with both the instructor and PPT slides gained the best learning outcomes. It was noted that they allocated much more visual attention to the instructor than to the PPT slides. It was additionally found that the 22 min was the time at which the participants reached the peak of mental fatigue. The results of our study imply that the use of educational technology is culture bound.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Video podcasts are considered as having great promise for education, as they can present information through vivid visual and audio forms simultaneously, and the learning outcome of video podcasts has become a subject of considerable research interest. However, researchers gained consistent results on the learning outcomes of video podcasts. Understanding the learning process of video podcasts, in particular, viewing behaviours, and mental fatigue of learners, is crucial to improving learning outcomes.

Perspectives

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically compare the learning outcome of four common presenting modes of video podcasts and explore via eye movement analysis, the time when learners experience the onset of mental fatigue in the educational context of China.

Dr Zhongling Pi
Central China Normal University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Learning process and learning outcomes of video podcasts including the instructor and PPT slides: a Chinese case, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, July 2015, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1060133.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page