What is it about?

The aim of this paper is to better understand cross-national variations in the informalisation of employment by evaluating critically three contrasting explanations which variously represent informal employment as more prevalent in: poorer under-developed economies (modernisation thesis); societies with high taxes, corruption and state interference in the free market (neo-liberal thesis) and societies with inadequate levels of state intervention to protect workers (political economy thesis). To evaluate these rival explanations, the relationship between the variable informalisation of employment in 10 Central and East European countries, measured using data from a 2007 Eurobarometer cross-national survey involving 5769 faceto- face interviews, and their broader work and welfare regimes are analysed.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The finding is that wealthier, less corrupt and more equal societies and those possessing higher levels of taxation, social protection and effective redistribution via social transfers are significantly more likely to have lower levels of informalisation. No evidence is thus found to support the neo-liberal tenets that the informalisation of employment results from high taxes and too much state interference in the free market but evidence is found to positively confirm the modernisation and political economy theses as explanations for the cross-national variations in the informalisation of employment.

Perspectives

This paper clearly sets out the policies that need to be pursued to tackle the informal economy in East-Central Europe

Professor Colin C Williams
University of Sheffield

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Explaining Cross-National Variations in the Informalisation of Employment, European Societies, July 2015, Taylor & Francis, DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2015.1051073.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page