What is it about?

Most of what passes for quality assurance in higher education is about facilities, services, student characteristics and so on. Data on performance too often relies on institutional self-reports. There is very little about providing any sort of guarantee that students are actually achieving to the levels they are supposed to. It is a mystery what a Pass in a course actually implies in terms of acquired student capability. My article is an argument that lack of attention to this needs to be fixed. I describe an approach that could assist the process.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Employers and others often complain that they cannot rely on the higher education qualifications of graduates. Of course, a large proportion of graduates are appropriately competent in their fields, but too many are not. Employers do not know how much trust to put in grades on transcripts. This is a major quality assurance challenge, so far seriously neglected. The higher education community needs to take this on board, otherwise external agencies will.

Perspectives

I have had a long term interest in 'standards' of all types, and also in why some can be codified and others cannot. I applied this background to what I see as a lingering problem in higher education, particularly with massification and consequential changes over the past three decades in many countries.

D Royce Sadler
University of Queensland

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Academic achievement standards and quality assurance, Quality in Higher Education, May 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2017.1356614.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page