What is it about?
Looking at Time's coverage of the Cambodian bombings of the late 1960's and early 1970's, this article argues that mainstream American journalism often lacks the means to critique and question American military power abroad. In the case of the Cambodia, Richard Nixon became a necessary focus for criticisms, operating in a way that allowed the broader legitimacy of American militarism to persist across Time's reporting.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
American media and the United States military have long had a complicated relationship, escaping more normative notions of public accountability. Done in secret and rarely deliberated openly, the Cambodian bombings reveal the limits of the press to draw public attention to workings of military power and might.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “The Rising Tide of War”: Cambodian Bombings and the Discourses of American Military Power inTime, The Communication Review, October 2013, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2013.839539.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







