What is it about?

This article introduces innovative incentive-based-zoning-reform policy adopted in Massachusetts in the backdrop of other state-mandates. It lays out pros and cons of (state-mandates) and (voluntary-state-zoning-incentives) in terms of affordable housing production. Police experiences from California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland and Oregon have been shared.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It unfolds weaknesses of state-mandates and informs how the voluntary-incentive-based policies could address some of those weaknesses. The article offers suggestions to improve both the mandatory as well as incentive based zoning reform policies for affordable housing production in contemporary America.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Mandatory Versus Incentive-Based State Zoning Reform Policiesfor Affordable Housing in the United States:A Comparative Assessment, Housing Policy Debate, June 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2014.917691.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page