What is it about?
This article analyses Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing (1972), from a Lacanian perspective, as a myth of the origins of desire. Emotionally deadened, the vital question which comes into focus for the protagonist is not whether or not she did the right thing but why she doesn’t feel anything; vaguely aware of something ‘missing’ in herself, she attempts to regain a lost ‘wholeness’. What she recovers, I will argue, is not a mythical missing ‘half,’ but the signifier of desire, in the form of a fish.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Lacanian concepts have entered current theoretical discourse, but are often subsumed within other debates which do not locate these concepts within the larger framework of Lacan's work. Similarly, the quest motif in Surfacing has often been dealt with, but the object of the quest is generally situated outside the protagonist. Here, I revisit the quest motif in Surfacing by addressing the question of subjectivity and the emergence of desire through a detailed Lacanian reading.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: For the Love of a Fish: A Lacanian Reading of Margaret Atwood'sSurfacing, LIT Literature Interpretation Theory, January 2015, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/10436928.2015.996276.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page