What is it about?
Using a sample of 222 repeat visitors in an Australian national park, the findings indicate positive significant effects of (1) place satisfaction on quality-of-life; (2) place satisfaction on place attachment; (3) place attachment on quality-of-life; (4) park citizenship on place attachment. The findings further support that (5) place attachment mediates the relationship between place satisfaction and quality-of-life; (6) social involvement moderates the relationship between place satisfaction and place attachment; (7) park citizenship moderates the relationship between place satisfaction and place attachment; (8) social involvement moderates the relationship between place attachment and quality-of-life; (9) social involvement moderates the indirect effect of place satisfaction on quality-of-life. KEYWORDS: Quality-of-life, place satisfaction, place attachment, park citizenship, social involvement, moderated mediation
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Park managers, for example, need to promote on-site marketing and post-visit communication/interpretation, encouraging repeat visits and behavioural change. Message delivery needs to promote a sense of belonging to the park with personal meaning, creating place distinctiveness. Personal actions to promote include signing petitions supporting the park's biodiversity, and other resources, and volunteering to participate in meetings and other direct actions.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Social involvement and park citizenship as moderators for quality-of-life in a national park, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, August 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1354866.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







