What is it about?
Volunteer tourism has been heavily criticised for its negative consequences on destinations and volunteers, often the direct result of unrealistic demand-led marketing and lack of consideration for the environmental and social costs of host communities. While some industry participants have responded through adherence to best practice, little information or support is available about how to responsibly market volunteer tourism. This research uses an online content analysis based on the International Voluntourism Guidelines for Commercial Operators to understand the use of responsibility as a market signalling tool.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This innovative paper puts data to what was previously suspected but not evidenced in volunteer tourism. We find that responsibility is not used for market signalling; preference is given to communicating what is easy, and not what is important. The status of the organisation is no guarantee of responsible practice, and price and responsibility communications display an inverse relationship. We conclude volunteer tourism operators are overpositioning and communicating responsibility inconsistently, which highlights greenwashing, requiring at least industry-wide codes of practice, and at best, regulation.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Volunteer tourism, greenwashing and understanding responsible marketing using market signalling theory, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, January 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2013.871021.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page