What is it about?

The expansion of public ownership after 2008 occurred in many European countries as a crisis-management tool. Is the new wave of Hungarian nationalisation a part of this general trend or a component of a unique, ‘unorthodox’ economic policy of the Orban government? The article sums up the main features of recent European nationalisation and reveals similarities and differences in this context.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper argues that although current ownership changes in Hungary are outwardly consistent with those that have occurred in other European countries (and in the United States), they in fact reflect the particular agenda of the post-2010 Orbán government. The key peculiarity of the recent Hungarian nationalisations is their embeddedness in a complex system of political and economic changes rather than being aimed at short-term crisis management.

Perspectives

I think ownership matters, and the paper aims at shading light some peculiarities of recent nationalizations and privatizations in Europe and Hungary.

Eva Voszka
University of Szeged

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Nationalisation in Hungary in the Post-Crisis Years: A Specific Twist on a European Trend?, Europe Asia Studies, May 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2018.1457137.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page