What is it about?

The new refined version of the well acknoweldged novelty assessment approach of Shah et al. allows to correctly assess any set of ideas, even if constituted by ideas implementing etherogeneous numbers of attributes. Indeed, the original version of the metric leads to misleading results when the assessed ideas miss to implement some of the expected attributes or functions, or when implement one or more extra attributes.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The proposed refinement is extremely important to ensure correct novelty assessments in real cases. Indeed, real idea generation sessions (expecially if performed by unexperienced students) often lead to ideas implementing different number of attributes. There are, in fact, many reasons that can lead a person to neglect some expected attributes (if any) or to add one or more extra attributes (e.g. distractions, personal convinctions, wrong interpretation of the task, etc.).

Perspectives

The impact expected for this work is to allow to improve the applicability and the quality of the future research works related to Design Creativity.

Eng. PhD Lorenzo Fiorineschi
Department of Industrial Engineering. University of Florence - Italy

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Refined metric for a-posteriori novelty assessments, Journal of Engineering Design, September 2021, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2021.1976397.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page