What is it about?

This short essay intends to provide insight into the concepts of ‘fossiliferous deposit’ and ‘palaeontological deposit’ by identifying some of their semantic differences. Also, a brief discussion on the epistemic value of the dichotomy ‘to deposit’ versus ‘to reposit’ applied to palaeontological museology is brought up.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Although fossiliferous deposits are studied in palaeontology, to make a semantic distinction between fossiliferous and palaeontological deposits is heuristically important. At first sight, it can give the impression that this distinction is rather hair-splitting. However, from the point of view of philosophy of science, fossiliferous and palaeontological deposits should be considered two different epistemological (as well as ontological) categories.

Perspectives

By identifying semantic differences, the concepts of ‘fossiliferous deposit’ and ‘palaeontological deposit’ can be framed better within the philosophical development of the palaeontological sciences.

Dr Policarp Hortolà
Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Conceptualising ‘fossiliferous deposit’ against ‘palaeontological deposit’: some semantic (and epistemological) considerations, Historical Biology, April 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2015.1055558.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page