What is it about?
The article "Vice and Virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: A Comparative Analytic Reconsideration of the Indian Sub-Continent’s Constitutional Practices" by Md. Abdul Malek is published in the Commonwealth Law Bulletin. This article analyzes how the Basic Structure Doctrine has been used in the constitutional practices of the Indian subcontinent. It examines the Basic Structure Doctrine and its application in constitutional practices, offers a comparative analysis of the doctrine in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, and highlights the challenges faced in its implementation. It also discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of the doctrine and provides insights for future research and reforms in the region.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This article is important because it provides a comparative analysis of the Basic Structure Doctrine in the constitutional practices of the Indian subcontinent. The Basic Structure Doctrine is a fundamental principle of constitutional law in India and other countries in the region, and its application has been the subject of much debate and controversy. The author's analysis sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of the doctrine, and its role in protecting constitutional values and upholding democratic principles. It is a valuable contribution to the field of constitutional law and comparative legal studies.
Perspectives
The article "Vice and Virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: A Comparative Analytic Reconsideration of the Indian Sub-Continent’s Constitutional Practices" provides an insightful analysis of the Basic Structure Doctrine and its application in the constitutional practices of the Indian subcontinent and presents a comparative study of the legal systems in India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, highlighting the similarities and differences in their approach to constitutionalism and the Basic Structure Doctrine. The author's comparison of the constitutional practices of this region sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of the Basic Structure Doctrine as a tool for preserving the core values of a constitution. The article highlights the need for a balanced approach in interpreting the Basic Structure Doctrine, recognizing the importance of preserving the core values of a constitution while also allowing for flexibility and adaptation to changing times.
Mr. Md. Abdul Malek
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Vice and virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: a comparative analytic reconsideration of the Indian sub-continent’s constitutional practices, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, January 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/03050718.2017.1358648.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
