What is it about?
This paper presents the case study of three planners who risked their jobs to oppose unethical political pressures in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. It attempts to understand what was done by these planners to address those pressures and what lessons could we learn from their experiences. This research found that in a hostile political environment where an unethical political pressure is strong, and voicing is of little help, unique actions of procedural planning (exit, deny-exit-and-expose, and defend), deontological in nature may have to be adopted.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This would make planners better in handling political pressure
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: What Should Planners Do to Address Unethical Political Pressure?, Planning Practice and Research, February 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2017.1286891.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page