What is it about?
In 2012, Massachusetts created a new law that removes some job security projections for public K-12 teachers. This article is about how the law was developed - an unconventional process in which two competing organizations (a teachers' union and a non-profit organization) met to negotiate a compromise. They had two important characteristics in common: they both wanted political conflict resolved and, in order to do so, they were willing to walk away from their commitments as vehicles for public engagement in educational policy making.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It is an example of how national level political pressure affects state level lawmaking.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Neo-democracy in educational policy-making: a critical case study of neoliberal reform in Massachusetts, Journal of Education Policy, November 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1258592.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







