What is it about?

The term “mixed income housing” is not consistently defined, so there is no clear understanding of what it is, what characterizes it, and how mixed-income projects differ from one another. We analyze a data set of all 260 HOPE VI mixed-income redevelopment projects, grant announcements, and internal records from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to develop a framework for categorizing key aspects of mixed-income housing.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

We show that HOPE VI developments vary ­dramatically across four key dimensions of mixed-income housing: 1) allocation - the proportion and range of incomes included in projects; 2) proximity - the spatial scale at which income mixing is intended; 3) tenure - the balance between rental housing and homeownership units; and 4) duration - the amount of time projects remain mixed income based on funding restrictions. Planners can influence the nature of mixed-income housing projects by making choices about the range of options offered within these dimensions.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: All Mixed Up: Making Sense of Mixed-Income Housing Developments, Journal of the American Planning Association, January 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1248475.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page