What is it about?
This paper explores the relationship between Adam Boreel, an early spokesperson among the Collegiants in Amsterdam, and the Doopsgezind (liberal Mennonite) preacher Galenus Abrahamsz. After giving historical information on the relationship between Boreel and Galenus, it reveales that Galenus’s first published work relied heavily on Boreel’s writings and that they both aimed to establish religious toleration among Christians. Despite this, it also shows that Galenus did not share Boreel’s highest goal – to reform and unite Christianity – as Galenus intended to use Collegiant ideas only to improve his own Doopsgezind congregation. Because of this, the conclusion questions the idea that Galenus was a Collegiant and suggests that he could have been just a sympathizer of their ideas.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This is an important contribution for scholars interested in the history of the Collegiants and Doopsgezinden, and in the broader history of toleration. Many scholars claimed that Boreel's ideas exerted great influence on Galenus, but a comparison between their writings was lacking. This paper offers a thorough comparison between Boreel's ideas and Galenus's first published writing, revealing how much Boreel's view impacted on Galenus. More broadly, this paper contributes to the history of religious toleration, revealing how religious dissenters, both the non-confessional Collegiants and the liberal Mennonites, were advocates of religious toleration in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Adam Boreel and Galenus Abrahamsz. Against constraint of consciences: seventeenth-century dissenters in favor of religious toleration, History of European Ideas, August 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2018.1509224.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







