What is it about?

Union–management relations in the U.S. are best described as adversarial. However, under certain circumstances, they can become cooperative. One example of the latter was the role of trade unions in the conversion of firms to employee ownership. Firm ownership (entrepreneurship, capitalism) by employees has increased in recent years. Specifically, we focus on the use of ‘investment bargaining’ (i.e. buyouts using ESOPs) by the United Steelworkers of America during the decades of the 1980s and 1990s as the steel industry faced serious declines. This study applies some basic union–management bargaining frameworks for examining both primary (e.g. case studies) and secondary data to demonstrate that the USW’s adoption of investment bargaining is consistent with their pragmatic approach in preserving the employment of their members. The impact and the implications of the union’s efforts in this area as well as the future role of unions in employee buyouts are also discussed. ‘

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It is often believed that employee ownership is incompatible with labor unions, yet many unions have promoted employee ownership as a way to save forms and preserve jobs. The United Steel Workers of America is among the leading labor organizations in this effort.

Perspectives

The USWA was very careful in performing due diligence in determining if a firm was a candidate for an employee buyout. They used Wall Street expertise in this effort. Only about 20% of the firms applying were able to proceed with a buyout.

Dr Richard C. Hoffman
Salisbury University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Employee ownership and union labor: the case of United Steel Workers of America, Labor History, November 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/0023656x.2017.1255540.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page