What is it about?
This article discusses ways in which many theories of learning are founded on dogmatic assumptions that limit our understanding of what learning may involve.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The article suggests novel and original ways to think about learning.
Perspectives
I this article is connected of a series of essays on how to explore issues of learning and education through ordinary language philosophy. Other essays are "The Weight of Dogmatism" in Peters and Stickney A Companion to Wittgenstein and Education; and "Questions from the Rough Ground" in Studies in Philosophy and Education.
Viktor Johansson
Orebro Universitet
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Killing the Buddha: Towards a heretical philosophy of learning, Educational Philosophy and Theory, June 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1336917.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
