What is it about?

Our article delves into the historical and ethical dimensions of student-to-school counselor ratios in the United States, exploring how these ratios are determined and their impact on school dynamics and student outcomes. Initially, we trace the evolution of the school counselor's role and how staffing recommendations have developed over time, underscoring the significance of aligning counselor availability with school needs to foster an effective educational environment. We use a comprehensive review of existing research and new analysis of national data to illustrate the profound disparities in counselor availability, particularly in states and districts that are underfunded and serve a higher proportion of low-income students and students of color. Our research shows that these disparities are not just numbers; they reflect a deeper ethical issue concerning educational equity and the right of every student to have access to adequate counseling services. Our findings suggest that lower student-to-counselor ratios lead to better student outcomes, including higher graduation rates and improved mental health. We argue that achieving optimal counselor-to-student ratios is not merely a logistical target but a moral imperative that speaks to the core values of fairness and equality in education. By providing detailed data and persuasive analysis, we make a strong case for policy reforms aimed at reducing counselor-to-student ratios as a strategic move to enhance educational equity and effectiveness.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The importance of our research lies in its potential to influence policy and practice within the educational system. By highlighting how insufficient counselor staffing disproportionately affects underprivileged schools, we call attention to a critical, often overlooked aspect of educational inequality. Our work serves as a call to action for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders to reevaluate and reform their staffing practices to ensure that all students have equal access to the support they need. Addressing this issue is crucial not only for improving individual student outcomes but also for enhancing the overall health of the educational ecosystem. School counselors play a pivotal role in addressing students' academic and socioemotional needs, which are fundamental for fostering resilient, well-rounded individuals who can contribute positively to society. By advocating for lower ratios and better distribution of school counselors, we aim to promote a more equitable educational landscape where every student has the opportunity to succeed.


Publishing this research in Ethics & Behavior underscores our commitment to not just academic exploration but also to ethical advocacy in education. This work reflects our deep belief in the power of well-informed, conscientially crafted policy to make a tangible difference in the lives of students across the nation. It is our hope that our findings galvanize stakeholders to implement meaningful changes in school counseling practices. This publication not only contributes to academic discourse but also acts as a lever for social change, encouraging a reevaluation of values and priorities in education systems nationwide.

Dr. Carleton Brown
University of Texas at El Paso

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Student-to-school counselor ratios: understanding the history and ethics behind professional staffing recommendations and realities in the United States, Ethics & Behavior, May 2024, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2024.2342520.
You can read the full text:



The following have contributed to this page