What is it about?
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the advance organizer model (AOM) on students’ academic achievement in learning work and energy. The design of the study was quasi-experimental pretest–posttest nonequivalent control groups. Constructionist perspective which says paradigm shift from teacher center to student center is employed in this article.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The important thing in this article is teachers need to change their paradigm from teacher expert to student expert. Using active learning in class room instruction is effective.for instance using advance organizer model in class room is tested its effectiveness in this study. The findings of the study showed that the AOM was more effective than the conventional teaching method with effect size of 0.49. This model was also effective to teach male and female students and objectives namely understanding and application. However, both methods were equally important to teach work and energy under the objective knowledge level.
Perspectives
This article may help researchers, teachers and scholars who specifically conducting research on science education. Students will understand science meaningfully if the students learn by science education (Subject matter + methodology) specialized teachers. As result students in the glop as a whole might become creative to overcome the current problems occurred. This article might helping me to contact with worldwide researchers to work together on common issues.
Asay Gidena
Adwa College of Teachers Education
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The effectiveness of advance organiser model on students’ academic achievement in learning work and energy, International Journal of Science Education, September 2017, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1369600.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
