What is it about?

This is a critique of a book criticising the Chomskyan program. My argument is that the book does not go far enough in criticising not only the Chomskyan program, but the whole Structuralist view it is based on.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It is time we moved away from the constraints on our understanding of the nature of language and communication placed on us by the Structuralist (including Chomskyan) approach.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Review of Evans (2014): The language myth: Why language is not an instinct, Studies in Language, April 2016, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/sl.40.1.09lap.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page