What is it about?
Operationalization of topos of history as an initiator strategy of negative other presentation is problematized with an example from Turkish politics. This paper is also an answer to the question of what discursive challenges political opposition parties face that once ruled as state-parties.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
History re-conceptualized as an 'institutional ad hominem' diminishes the critical capacity of political opposition parties and the space of deliberation concerning the on-going policy making shrinks as a result. This result is crucial for developing an alternative critical position towards the notion of democratic politics.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Discursive strategies of instrumentalizing history in mainstream Turkish political discourse, Journal of Language and Politics, April 2014, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/jlp.13.1.05kuc.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page