What is it about?

Elie Wiesel's Night is one of the most widely read accounts of the Holocaust. Few readers know that it exists in two English translations: Stella Rodway's from 1960 and Marion Wiesel's from 2006. Both are based on the French La Nuit (1958), which Wiesel himself shortened and reworked from a much longer Yiddish original published in Buenos Aires in 1956. This article compares the two English versions passage by passage and finds that they tell the story differently. The 1960 translation tends to smooth the text. It replaces hesitant ellipses with full stops, swaps German camp terms such as Blockälteste for plain English, and places the narrator "at" Auschwitz. The 2006 translation restores the broken rhythm, keeps the German vocabulary, and places the narrator "in" Auschwitz. The article also traces the people and institutions behind each version, including publishers, editors and literary mentors, and shows how they shaped what English-speaking readers received.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

As the last Holocaust survivors pass away, their testimony increasingly reaches new generations through texts, and very often through translations. Choices that look minor, such as punctuation, a preposition or a pronoun, can soften or sharpen how readers experience a survivor's trauma. Night is taught in schools and universities around the world, yet many classrooms still use the older translation without knowing how it differs. The article gives teachers, students, translators and publishers concrete examples of what changes between versions and why it matters. It also appears at a symbolic moment: 70 years after the Yiddish original and 20 years after the retranslation that most students now read.

Perspectives

I wrote this article because I believe translation is never neutral, least of all when it carries testimony of mass violence. Comparing the two versions of Night showed me how much a translator, a publisher or a market can shape the memory that reaches readers. It also showed how a retranslation can restore what was lost. I hope the article encourages readers and teachers to pay attention to which edition they hold. I also hope researchers will apply the same questions to other survivor testimonies as they travel across languages and generations. The article is open access, so anyone can read it for free.

Pr. STEPHANIE ENGOLA
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Translation as a repository of violence and resistance, FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, September 2026, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/forum.26003.eng.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page