What is it about?
This corpus-based study explores the effects of relay interpreting at meetings of the United Nations General Assembly by comparing features of disfluency between the outputs of relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting (SI).
Featured Image
Photo by Frederic Köberl on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Findings suggest that relay interpreting may affect the output of relay takers from multiple perspectives. This corpus-based study of authentic data on disfluencies in relay and non-relay SI output helps to substantiate the findings of previous research on relay interpreting and disfluency in interpreting.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Disfluency in relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting, FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, July 2019, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/forum.18016.che.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
