What is it about?
The English auxiliaries have been a matter of dispute for decades with two opposing views: one analysis treats them as main verbs that take a VP complement; the other considers them as feature carriers. Proponents of both approaches have convincingly pointed out each other’s weaknesses without however settling the debate and without accounting for the fact that the English VP is still evolving today. The goal of this paper is to show that Construction Grammar offers a way out of the current status quo. This claim is substantiated by a computational formalization of the English verb phrase in Fluid Construction Grammar that includes a bi-directional processing model for formulation and comprehension available for online testing.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This paper offers a working example that a construction grammar account can combine the strengths of the two leading accounts of auxiliaries in linguistics.
Perspectives
This article has had a long publication history dating more than three years before seeing the light of day. I am very happy that it finally found a home, because the work described in the paper has been the seed of many breakthroughs in computational construction grammar in the past few years.
Remi van Trijp
Sony Computer Science Laboratories Paris
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: How a Construction Grammar account solves the auxiliary
controversy, Constructions and Frames, December 2017, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/cf.00004.van.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
