What is it about?
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Chinese merchants from Shanxi Province traded with Mongolian-speaking communities. To communicate with their trading partners, they compiled handwritten glossaries and phrasebooks using Chinese characters to represent Mongolian words and expressions. This study examines why certain Chinese characters, particularly those containing the mouth radical (口), were used to represent Mongolian sounds. It shows that these characters were not chosen randomly. Instead, merchants developed practical ways of using familiar written symbols to record an unfamiliar language. By examining these character choices, the study reveals how ordinary people adapted an existing writing system to meet the needs of communication across language boundaries. It also provides new insights into the relationship between writing, language contact, and everyday commercial activities.
Featured Image
Photo by krzhck on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Writing systems are often studied in relation to the languages they were originally designed to represent. However, writing can also be adapted to record other languages, especially in situations where people need to communicate across linguistic boundaries. This study shows how Chinese merchants developed practical solutions for representing Mongolian sounds using Chinese characters, particularly characters containing the mouth radical. These choices reveal that the adaptation of writing systems was not limited to scholars or official institutions but also occurred in everyday commercial activities. By examining these little-studied handwritten materials, the research offers new insights into how writing systems can be adapted to different linguistic needs. It also highlights the creativity of ordinary language users and the importance of historical trade documents for understanding language contact and cross-cultural communication.
Perspectives
One of the most interesting aspects of these historical glossaries and phrasebooks is that they were created not by professional linguists, but by merchants who needed to communicate across language boundaries. What particularly interests us is how these merchants made practical choices when using Chinese characters to represent Mongolian sounds. Their use of characters containing the mouth radical offers a valuable opportunity to examine how an existing writing system was adapted for a specific communicative purpose. We hope this study encourages greater attention to handwritten materials produced by ordinary language users, as they can reveal aspects of writing practices and language contact that are often overlooked in conventional historical sources.
Nobuharu SATO
Hiroshima Daigaku
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Local solutions to universal problems, Written Language & Literacy, October 2026, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/wll.00103.lia.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
