What is it about?
The author uses discourse analysis to unveil the strategies of building a common ground and retaining conversations of speakers coming from different socio-cultural backgrounds.
Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The study shows that the dynamism and conversational tactics of people coming from different socio-cultural backgrounds are more diverse and distinctive, compared with those coming from a relatively similar contexts. The dynamism ranges from the use of word choices to the ways of keeping the conversations going. Specific examples can be seen from the corpus. It is useful to understand those conversational strategies not only to indicate how linguistic repertoires are exploited to serve communicative needs. Those strategies also approve the fact that speakers are active language participants that find ways to overcome linguistic and even conceptual barriers caused by differences in socio-cultural backgrounds.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The use of indexicals to co-construct common ground on the continuum of intra- and intercultural communicative contexts, Pragmatics & Cognition, December 2019, John Benjamins, DOI: 10.1075/pc.19005.din.
You can read the full text:
The use of indexicals on the Communication Continuum
The presentation is about my study on the roles of indexicals in explicating speakers’ intentions and constructing common ground (CG) in the context of a continuum with two extreme endpoints, the intracultural at one end, and the intercultural at the other, within the framework of the socio-cognitive approach proposed and developed by Kecskes (2008, 2010, 2014) and Kecskes and Zhang (2009).
The following have contributed to this page