What is it about?
Critical states are thought to endow biological systems with important advantages, such as robustness and adaptability. This appears in cell collectives, which self-organize into flows whose swirling boundaries show a universal pattern, looking the same under changes in position, orientation, and magnification. We show for the first time that cell division, not general cell renewal, is what places the tissue right at the edge of this critical state, whose behaviour aligns with what is found in critical percolation. Using two independent drugs to block division, alongside a computer model of dividing cells, we confirm this behaviour breaks down even though the cells keep moving in a coordinated way.
Featured Image
Photo by Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash
Why is it important?
We show that cell division places tissue flow into a critical state that follows critical percolation statistics. This is important to understand how a fundamental process regulates multiscale tissue mechanics and dynamics, regardless of details. Two significant findings are that: a) blocking cell division breaks this critical organization even though the tissue keeps flowing collectively; b) we identify the mechanism behind it: division keeps the cell-cell network mechanically flexible enough to rearrange across scales, and thus sustains criticality.
Perspectives
I hope this article makes people realise cell division does more than drive tissue growth and generic fluidity, but also locks the backbone of cell motion into universal behaviour. This is not just a problem for biophysicists - it is an issue that matters for real-life medical treatment, since antiproliferative interventions, widely used in cancer treatment, may unexpectedly alter collective tissue dynamics.
Tianxiang Ma
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cell division sets a universal flow geometry in cell layers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, July 2026, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2532420123.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







