What is it about?

Issue salience polarization, in which people with differing political ideologies disagree about the relative importance and urgency of issues, is dangerous as it can undermine collective problem-solving, deepen societal divides, and obstruct effective governance. Yet, the emergence of issue salience polarization, especially regarding seemingly nonideological issues, is poorly understood. This paper offers an account of this phenomenon, suggesting that introducing ideologically divisive solutions to nonpolarized issues triggers “spillover polarization.” Consistent with this account, four experiments demonstrate that pairing a nonpolarized issue with an ideologically divisive solution can cause individuals whose political beliefs align with the solution to exaggerate the issue’s importance, while those whose beliefs conflict with the solution downplay its importance, thus polarizing views of the previously neutral issue.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Solution spillover: Pairing issues with ideological solutions fuels polarization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, August 2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2512064122.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page