What is it about?

The risk of transmission of airborne viruses is increased in indoor settings, but how big of a difference can AC filters actually make? When are HEPA filters necessary and when would more affordable filters suffice? Our study looks at the fluid mechanics of how potentially virus-laden airborne nuclei can reach a host. We distinguish between a direct route in which the virus-carrying nuclei travel directly from the infected person to a receiving host and an indirect route, in which the nuclei are removed from the room and go through the ventilation system only to be re-injected back through the ventilation inlets.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

A high quality filter will limit the amount of nuclei that re-enter the room. In fact, nuclei can recycle many times through the ventilation system before finally reaching the receiving host. What sets our study aside from others is that we use a process known as statistical overloading to provide statistically relevant results by accounting for practically all possible direct and indirect routes, taking into account the turbulent chaotic nature of indoor air. This process is computationally expensive compared to traditional simulations and necessitates the use of tens of millions of droplet nuclei which are individually tracked for up to one or two hours. Our approach can handle any type of filtration and provides a correction function that can be easily used in conjunction with simple models to improve the fluid mechanics aspect of tracking droplet nuclei and provide an improved estimate for the risk of infection. Our easy-to-implement correction function accounts for the separation distance between the sick and the susceptible individuals, an important feature that is difficult to statistically quantify due to the turbulent chaotic nature of indoor air.

Perspectives

We demonstrate our approach in two settings, a classroom and a nursing home. Our analysis shows that using a HEPA filter can increase the cumulative exposure time in a typical classroom setting by up to four times and could allow visitations to nursing homes for up to 45 minutes. On the other hand, using more less efficient but more affordable filters with a filtration efficiency on the order of 67% can increase the cumulative exposure time in a typical classroom setting by up to three times and could allow visitations to nursing homes for up to 30 minutes. Finally, if no filtration is used, then the cumulative exposure time in a typical classroom setting would be limited to about 20 to 30 minutes, and visitations to nursing homes should not exceed 15 minutes.

Nadim Zgheib
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Fluid mechanics of air recycling and filtration for indoor airborne transmission, Physics of Fluids, January 2023, American Institute of Physics,
DOI: 10.1063/5.0135718.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page