What is it about?
People with aphasia often have trouble finding the words they want to say. This difficulty, called anomia, can make everyday communication frustrating and effortful. Word-finding therapy often helps people improve on the specific words they practice, but those gains do not always carry over to other words or real-life conversations. This review looked at how researchers have used “personalized” words in anomia treatment. Personalized words are words selected because they matter to the individual, such as names of family members, words related to daily routines, hobbies, work, home life, or personally important activities. We reviewed 21 studies and found that researchers often say they use personalized, relevant, or functional words, but they rarely define exactly what those terms mean. We also found that personalized words were usually selected through interviews, conversations, free listing, performance-based methods, or categories such as food, people, places, and household items. Our review suggests that personalized words may involve three overlapping ideas: words that are meaningful, words that are functional, and words that are frequent in a person’s everyday life.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Personalized word selection is important because word-finding treatment often improves the words that are practiced most directly. If therapy gains are limited to trained words, then choosing the right words becomes a key part of treatment. This review shows that personalization is widely valued in aphasia rehabilitation but is not yet defined or reported consistently. Without clearer definitions, it is difficult to compare studies, understand which types of personalized words are most helpful, or apply research findings in clinical practice. The review offers a practical way forward: clinicians and researchers can think about whether treatment words are meaningful to the person, useful for daily communication, and commonly needed in everyday life. This could help make anomia treatment more person-centered, more transparent, and more closely connected to communication participation and quality of life.
Perspectives
As clinicians and researchers, we have often seen the term “personally relevant” used as though its meaning is obvious. In practice, however, choosing treatment words for people with aphasia is complex. A word may matter emotionally, be useful in daily life, or be encountered often — but these are not always the same thing. This review was motivated by that clinical and research gap. If anomia treatment often produces the strongest gains for practiced words, then the words we choose for therapy are not just materials; they are part of the intervention itself. We hope this work encourages clinicians and researchers to be more explicit about how personalized words are selected, whose input is included, and what makes a word personally meaningful, functional, or frequent for a particular person. Ultimately, our goal is to make word-finding treatment more transparent, more person-centered, and more connected to everyday communication and participation.
Amy Vogel-Eyny
Hunter College
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Personalization of Words in Anomia Treatment for People With Aphasia: A Scoping Review, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 2026, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA),
DOI: 10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00512.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
