What is it about?

Have you ever been in a conversation and found yourself deciding whether to trust someone—even before they finished speaking? This study explored this split-second social instinct using a simple but revealing setup. Researchers started with everyday sentences, and using voice-morphing technology, gently tweaked the speaker’s tone—making it sound more or less confident, or leaning more masculine or feminine—all while keeping the words themselves neutral. Then, as participants listened, they were asked to move a cursor toward “believe” or “disbelieve” on the screen. But the researchers weren’t just interested in where they clicked. By watching the path of the mouse—its curves, hesitations, and corrections—they could trace the hidden tug-of-war happening in the mind: moments of doubt, reconsideration, and certainty, all unfolding in real time before a choice was even made.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Our research found that voices that sounded more assured were consistently trusted faster and more firmly. Intriguingly, the perceived gender of a voice—whether it sounded more masculine or feminine—played no meaningful role in whether someone was deemed credible.

Perspectives

This study employed a mouse-tracking paradigm to investigate the dynamic mechanisms of voice-based credibility perception, offering a way to capture real-time cognitive processes during decoding. It is our hope that this research will assist readers in better understanding how vocal expression shapes credibility judgments.

Zhikang Peng
Shanghai International Studies University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: On How Vocal Cues Impact Dynamic Credibility Judgments: Mouse-Tracking Paradigm Examining Speaker Confidence and Gender Through Voice Morphing, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, October 2025, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA),
DOI: 10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00849.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page