What is it about?
This study explores how grandparents coped during the first month following the October 7 attacks and the outbreak of war in Israel. Through in-depth interviews with 21 grandparents, we examined their experiences across three interconnected dimensions: as individuals dealing with their own fear and distress, as parents concerned for their adult children, and as grandparents trying to protect and support their grandchildren. The findings show that grandparents were not simply background supporters. They actively helped hold their families together, while also managing emotional overload, changing family roles, and their own need for safety and meaning.
Featured Image
Photo by Thomas Griggs on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Grandparents are often expected to support the entire family during crises, yet their own emotional experiences are frequently overlooked. This study shows that they may simultaneously carry personal distress, renewed responsibility for their adult children, and concern for their grandchildren. Understanding these multiple roles is especially important during war and collective trauma, when family boundaries and responsibilities can rapidly change. The findings may help professionals develop family interventions and support programs that include grandparents, recognize their emotional needs, and strengthen their ability to contribute to resilience across generations.
Perspectives
My interest in this study is rooted in my work as a researcher examining exposure to trauma in later life among old adultd, grandparents and development across the life course, and as a couple and family therapist. Across both research and clinical practice, I have become increasingly interested in the ways traumatic events affect not only individuals, but also relationships, family roles, and the connections between generations. Grandparents occupy a particularly complex position within the family. They are often seen primarily as sources of support, stability, and wisdom for others. Yet they are also individuals with emotional needs, personal histories, vulnerabilities, and fears of their own. At the same time, they remain parents to their adult children, even when those children have become parents themselves. This complexity became especially visible during the interviews. I was deeply struck by the grandparents’ movement between different parts of themselves: their personal experience of shock and uncertainty, their renewed concern for their adult children, and their wish to protect and reassure their grandchildren. These roles did not appear separately. They were experienced simultaneously and often created emotional tension, responsibility, and overload. From my perspective as a family therapist, this reinforced the importance of understanding trauma as a relational and intergenerational experience. A crisis does not affect each family member in isolation. It reshapes boundaries, responsibilities, expectations, and patterns of care throughout the family system. This study also strengthened my belief that grandparents should be seen as whole people, rather than only through the support they provide to younger generations. They may function as emotional anchors for the family, but they also need recognition, care, and space for their own experiences. I hope that bringing greater attention to this complexity will contribute to more sensitive research and clinical practice with grandparents and multigenerational families.
Dr. Lia Ring
Bar-Ilan University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Grandparents in 3D: Unpacking personal, parental, and grandparental dimensions in the immediate aftermath of an acute trauma., Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy, July 2026, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/tra0002235.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







