What is it about?

This paper synthesizes evidence from all group design studies of interventions that featured children with autism aged 0-8 years. The results report intervention effects by outcome domain (e.g., language, social communication, cognition, etc.) and by intervention approach (e.g., behavior, developmental, naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions). A total of 150 reports of 130 separate studies featuring over 6,000 children contributed to the results reported in this paper.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis to synthesizes evidence across all group design studies of intervention for children with autism. This is especially important given the recent rapid transformation of the evidence base; over 100 group design studies of interventions to support children with autism (including at least 50 randomized controlled trials) were published in the last decade. This meta-analysis also summarizes the quality of evidence for different intervention approaches and explores outcome-level quality indicators and their impact on intervention effects, illustrating that common researcher-made measurement decisions can bias our understanding of intervention effectiveness.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children., Psychological Bulletin, November 2019, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000215.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page