What is it about?
Racism in therapy and counseling goes beyond individual behavior and is deeply rooted in the systems and values that shape the field. We argue that many professionals rely too heavily on Western ideas—like individualism and universalism—without recognizing how these can unintentionally exclude or harm people from different cultural backgrounds. We call this “epistemological oppression,” meaning that one way of thinking is treated as the only valid one. To truly help everyone, psychology needs to embrace diverse worldviews and move away from one-size-fits-all approaches rooted in white Western traditions.
Featured Image
Photo by Frames For Your Heart on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The thesis of this article is important because it challenges professionals to look beyond individual actions and recognize how systemic values—especially those rooted in white Western traditions—can unintentionally harm clients from diverse backgrounds. By exposing how dominant ways of thinking shape definitions of mental health, professionalism, and ethical standards, the authors urge therapists to critically examine their assumptions and practices. This reflection is essential for creating more inclusive, culturally responsive, and liberating therapeutic environments for all clients, especially those from marginalized communities.
Perspectives
We hope this article will stimulate thoughtful discussion and debate about the importance of acknowledging non-western indigenous methods of healing and helping.
Professor Derald Wing Sue
Teachers College, Columbia University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Epistemological oppression and racism—Failure to see the forest from the trees: Reply to Mckay and Koppelman-White (2025) and Strambler (2025)., American Psychologist, September 2025, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/amp0001562.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







