What is it about?

Outbreaks of infectious diseases often go hand in hand with the spread of conspiracy beliefs. Once conspiracy beliefs take hold, they are difficult to change. These beliefs can make people less willing to follow public health advice, such as getting vaccinated. This research examines whether perspective-taking—trying to see from another person’s point of view—can reduce the negative impact of conspiracy beliefs on vaccine acceptance. Across six studies, participants were asked to take the perspective of people who held positive attitudes toward vaccination, either by reading interview excerpts, having live conversations, or watching a public-service-style video. The findings show that perspective-taking can consistently reduce the harmful effects of conspiracy beliefs on willingness to accept vaccines, even beyond COVID-19, and the effects were driven by feeling psychologically closer to others.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Vaccine hesitancy remains a major challenge for public health, especially as conspiracy beliefs continue to circulate widely through media and social interactions. Many existing interventions aim to correct misinformation directly, but these approaches often fail once beliefs are deeply entrenched. This research highlights perspective-taking as a low-cost and practical alternative. Rather than correcting people, encouraging them to understand the views of others is a more effective way. These findings offer valuable insights for psychologists, public health professionals, and policymakers seeking effective ways to promote vaccination and reduce the societal impact of conspiracy beliefs.

Perspectives

Writing this article was a pleasure. We are all deeply interested in this topic, and we worked closely together to develop interventions aimed at combating conspiratorial beliefs.

Cynthia Wang
Northwestern University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Conspiratorial beliefs and reduced vaccine acceptance: Understanding the role of perspective-taking., Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, December 2025, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000560.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page