What is it about?

Although acceptance may be an important step in responding to loss, such as those resulting from spinal cord injuries, through a careful analysis of specific cases, relevant literature, and drawing upon the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas we concluded that acceptance is a place that one arrives at and not something one can make happen. In fact, pressuring patients to accept their situation may not be helpful. In contrast, for example, denial may initially allow a person to move on. We present five responses to loss with the goal of enabling helpers, whether professionals or family, to address the situation of patients in a nuanced, empathic, and helpful way.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Injured persons are often given well-intentioned but typically not helpful advice to accept their new reality based on the assumption that doing so will help them to move forward. In this paper we critique this approach and call for helpers to encounter injured persons with a genuine openness to their circumstances and specific capacity for moving forward. Our perspective underscores the need for helpers’ emphatic encounter with those they serve as well as the need for societal and organizational support for flexible and person-oriented approaches.

Perspectives

Helping people who have experienced traumatic losses is a demanding and critical endeavor. I (Sanne Angel) have worked with and interviewed patients with spinal cord injury have formulated an understanding of acceptance that is closely connected with patients experience. I believe that it provides a novel and realistic foundation to work with patients in a respectful and sensitive way,

Steen Halling
Seattle University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Uses and abuses of the concept of acceptance in rehabilitation and recovery., The Humanistic Psychologist, November 2023, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/hum0000341.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page